Swiss finish would take shine off UBS’s M&A gift
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Liam Proud
LONDON, Oct 21 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Was UBS’s UBSG.S Credit Suisse acquisition the “deal of the century”? That phrase, coined by a Swiss lawmaker last year, sums up the widely held view of the wealth giant’s state-arranged rescue of its arch-rival in March 2023. The benefits for the enlarged bank run by Sergio Ermotti are vast. Yet decisions by regulators could lower UBS’s return on the acquisition from interstellar to merely respectable.
Evaluating M&A is more art than science. That’s especially true of deals involving banks, where asset markdowns and other accounting idiosyncrasies complicate the picture. A simple approach is to look at the earnings acquired by the buyer, plus any cost savings, and divide that figure by the all-in cost of the deal, including the purchase price and any restructuring costs.
At first blush that calculation looks excellent for UBS. The bank paid just $3.8 billion for Credit Suisse’s equity, according to its second-quarter 2023 filing. Analysts expect Ermotti to spend around $13 billion integrating the two firms, or $9.1 billion after tax, using a 30% rate. UBS also had to absorb extra provisions for litigation, fair-value accounting losses on the acquired assets and other hits, but those were neatly offset by the more than $17 billion boost the bank got from writing off Credit Suisse’s funky hybrid debt securities. Overall, then, the acquisition cost $12.9 billion.
In compensation, UBS gets savings which Ermotti reckons will reach $13 billion per year. After tax, that’s $9.1 billion. Divide that figure by the purchase price, and UBS is earning a massive 70% return on its investment. That calculation ignores any profit the retained Credit Suisse assets will generate. But given that the target was perennially loss-making and that Ermotti is ditching so much of the business, this does not change the merger maths.
That sky-high return figure overstates UBS’s gain, however. To start with, Ermotti has to run the enlarged bank with higher levels of equity capital, primarily because of Swiss rules that penalise lenders which have a larger market share. In February, UBS said its basic common equity Tier 1 (CET1) requirement will eventually rise to 12.4% of risk-weighted assets, from 10.6% today. Based on the bank’s balance sheet at the time, Ermotti estimated the additional capital required was about $10 billion.
Separately, UBS has removed a concession that supervisors had previously granted to Credit Suisse. In effect, this allowed the ailing lender to ignore valuation impairments at its subsidiaries when calculating the parent bank’s capital. Bringing Credit Suisse into line with UBS’s stricter treatment, Ermotti has said, adds about $9 billion to the capital requirements.
Those two additional add-ons are arguably part of the cost of UBS’s acquisition, since they suck up scarce capital resources. Add them to the purchase price, and the return on investment falls below 30%. That’s less spectacular, but still impressive.
There could be more to come, however. Swiss authorities are mulling an overhaul of the way the country’s lenders fund their international subsidiaries. For Ermotti’s group, these so-called foreign participations include UBS Americas Holding LLC and UBS Europe SE.
Current requirements allow the parent to fund its holdings in these subsidiaries with about 40% debt, meaning the underlying assets effectively have two layers of leverage – at the overseas unit, and again at the holding company. Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter could remove that loophole next year. She has said that could in theory boost UBS’s capital requirements by another $15 billion to $25 billion.
Assume UBS has to set aside a figure at the top end of that range and add it to the overall cost of buying Credit Suisse. The bank’s return on investment drops to 16% - still respectable, but not much reward for such a large and complex acquisition. Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria BBVA.MC has said it is hoping for a 20% return on invested capital if it manages to buy Spanish rival Banco de Sabadell SABE.MC. UniCredit CRDI.MI CEO Andrea Orcel would be solving for a minimum 15% return on investment from any possible deal with Germany’s Commerzbank CBKG.DE, a person familiar with the matter told Breakingviews.
Admittedly, this analysis leaves plenty out. The writedowns UBS took on the acquired Credit Suisse assets may be reversed if Ermotti hangs onto them and they mature at their original face value. Ermotti could arguably mitigate the effect of a bigger capital requirement by closing even more Credit Suisse divisions.
Yet there are risks, too. It’s possible that Credit Suisse’s historic legal problems could prove more painful than UBS expects, or that the integration hits a snag. There’s also the opportunity cost to consider. A month before the shotgun marriage, analyst forecasts compiled by Visible Alpha foresaw UBS generating $24 billion of earnings between 2023 and 2025, excluding the effects of one-off charges. Now, the enlarged bank looks set to bring in about $8 billion less than that, based on current Visible Alpha data and last year’s profit excluding M&A quirks. The gap partly reflects restructuring costs, but also Credit Suisse’s operating losses and missed revenue opportunities.
Investors are also withholding judgement. At the start of March 2023, weeks before the deal, UBS traded at 1.2 times its expected tangible book value for the coming 12 months – a 45% discount to Morgan Stanley MS.N, using LSEG Datastream figures. Today, Ermotti’s bank trades at roughly the same multiple but its U.S. wealth management rival has surged, widening the gap to 54%.
This mixed report card will doubtless influence the next bank CEO who answers a distress call from the country’s finance minister. They will be acutely aware that governments and other agencies can subsequently move the goalposts. The Swiss bank is not the first to experience this. JPMorgan JPM.N boss Jamie Dimon later regretted the U.S. bank’s decision to rescue troubled Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual during the 2008 financial meltdown, stating in 2015 that the two acquisitions accounted for 70% of the bank’s $19 billion bill related to toxic mortgages.
UBS’s Credit Suisse purchase came with far more generous terms and seems likely to end up as a net positive for shareholders in even the bleakest scenario. But the higher Swiss regulators push up its capital requirements, the more the next would-be bank rescuer will drive an even harder bargain.
Follow @Breakingviews on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Estimates that Swiss bank UBS will require another $15 billion to $25 billion in equity capital are about right, Switzerland's finance minister said on April 14, according to a report by the Tages-Anzeiger newspaper. Those orders of magnitude, which come from analysts’ estimates, are plausible, Karin Keller-Sutter said in an interview.
Keller-Sutter was speaking after the Swiss government set out proposals to tighten regulation for banks deemed "too big to fail", particularly UBS.
UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti said on May 7 that the bank was already adding almost $20 billion in additional capital as part of the deal, before any future requirements.
UBS performance since March 2023: good, not great https://reut.rs/3Ud25KS
Valuation gap persists between UBS and Morgan Stanley https://reut.rs/3UeaNZA
Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Streisand Neto
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
